There isn’t any point in denying that the outburst of sympathy and
support that followed my confession to an attempt at self-slaughter
last year (Richard Herring podcast) has touched me very deeply.
Some people, as some people always will, cannot understand that
depression (or in my case cyclothymia, a form of bipolar disorder) is an
illness and they are themselves perhaps the sufferers of a malady that
one might call either an obsession with money, or a woeful lack of
imagination.
“How can someone so well-off, well-known and successful have depression?” they ask. Alastair Campbell in a marvelous article,
suggested changing the word “depression” to “cancer” or “diabetes” in
order to reveal how, in its own way, sick a question, it is.
Ill-natured, ill-informed, ill-willed or just plain ill, it’s hard to
say.
But, most people, a surging, warm, caring majority, have been kind.
Almost too kind. There’s something a little flustering and embarrassing
when a taxi-driver shakes you by the hand, looks deep into your eyes and
says “You look after yourself, mate, yes? Promise me?” And there’s
something perhaps not too helpful to one’s mental health when it is the
only subject people want to talk to you about, however kindly or for
whatever reasons.
But I have nothing to complain about. I won’t go into the terrible
details of the bottle of vodka, the mixture of pills and the closeness
to permanent oblivion I came. You can imagine them and I don’t want to
upset the poor TV producer and hotel staff who had to break down my door
and find me in the unconscious state I was in, four broken ribs thanks
to some sort of convulsive fit that must have overtaken me while I lay
almost comatose, vomit dribbling from my mouth. You can picture the
scene.
The episode, plus the relationship I now have with a magnificent
psychiatrist, has made made my mental health better, I think, than it’s
ever been. I used to think it utterly normal that I suffered from
“suicidal ideation” on an almost daily basis. In other words, for as
long as I can remember, the thought of ending my life came to me
frequently and obsessively. But then it’s the thought behind the most
famous speech in all history. To be, or not to be.
To be, or not to be: that is the question:
Whether ’tis nobler in the mind to suffer
The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune,
Or to take arms against a sea of troubles,
And by opposing end them? To die: to sleep;
No more; and by a sleep to say we end
The heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks
That flesh is heir to, ’tis a consummation
Devoutly to be wish’d. To die, to sleep;
To sleep: perchance to dream: ay, there’s the rub;
For in that sleep of death what dreams may come
When we have shuffled off this mortal coil,
Must give us pause: there’s the respect
That makes calamity of so long life;
For who would bear the whips and scorns of time,
The oppressor’s wrong, the proud man’s contumely,
The pangs of despised love, the law’s delay,
The insolence of office and the spurns
That patient merit of the unworthy takes,
When he himself might his quietus make
With a bare bodkin? who would fardels bear,
To grunt and sweat under a weary life,
But that the dread of something after death,
The undiscover’d country from whose bourn
No traveller returns, puzzles the will
And makes us rather bear those ills we have
Than fly to others that we know not of?
Thus conscience does make cowards of us all;
And thus the native hue of resolution
Is sicklied o’er with the pale cast of thought,
And enterprises of great pith and moment
With this regard their currents turn awry,
And lose the name of action…
Take time to read it slowly to yourself or out loud. I don’t have
Hamlet’s wit (or Shakespeare’s of course) but every logical or doubtful
step from line to line expresses better how hard I thought about the
advantages and cursed (as I thought) disadvantages against suicide. The
speech, for the most part, stayed my hand. As it did Hamlet’s.
But medicine, much as some don’t like to hear it, can help. I am on a
regime of four a day. One is an SNRI, the other a mood-stabilizer. I
haven’t considered suicide in anything other than a puzzled intellectual
way since this pharmaceutical regime “kicked in”.
But I can still be sad. Perhaps you might go to my tumblr
page and see what Bertrand Russell wrote about his abiding passions
(it’s the last section of the page). I can be sad for the same reason he
was, though I do so much less about it than that great man did. But I
can be sad for personal reasons because I am often forlorn, unhappy and
lonely. These are qualities all humans suffer from and do not qualify
(except in their worst extremes) as mental illnesses.
Lonely? I get invitation cards through the post almost every
day. I shall be in the Royal Box at Wimbledon and I have serious and
generous offers from friends asking me to join them in the South of
France, Italy, Sicily, South Africa, British Columbia and America this
summer. I have two months to start a book before I go off to Broadway
for a run of Twelfth Night there.
I can read back that last sentence and see that, bipolar or not, if I’m under treatment and not actually depressed, what the fuck right do I have to be lonely, unhappy or forlorn? I don’t have the right. But there again I don’t have the right not to have those feelings. Feelings are not something to which one does or does not have rights.
In the end loneliness is the most terrible and contradictory of my
problems. I hate having only myself to come home to. If I have a book to
write, it’s fine. I’m up so early in the morning that even I pop out
for an early supper I am happy to go straight to bed, eager to be up and
writing at dawn the next day. But otherwise…
It’s not that I want a sexual partner, a long-term partner, someone
to share a bed and a snuggle on the sofa with – although perhaps I do
and in the past I have had and it has been joyful. But the fact is I
value my privacy too. It’s a lose-lose matter. I don’t want to be alone,
but I want to be left alone. Perhaps this is just a form of narcissism,
vanity, overdemanding entitlement – give it whatever derogatory term
you think it deserves. I don’t know the answer.
I suppose I just don’t like my own company very much. Which is odd,
given how many times people very kindly tell me that they’d put me on
their ideal dinner party guestlist. I do think I can usually be relied
upon to be good company when I’m out and about and sitting round a table
chatting, being silly, sharing jokes and stories and bringing shy
people out of their shells.
But then I get home and I’m all alone again.
I don’t write this for sympathy. I don’t write it as part as my on
going and undying commitment to the cause of mental health charities
like Mind. I don’t quite know why I write it. I think I write it because it fascinates me.
And perhaps I am writing this for any of you out there who are lonely
too. There’s not much we can do about it. I am luckier than many of you
because I am lonely in a crowd of people who are mostly very nice to me
and appear to be pleased to meet me. But I want you to know that you
are not alone in your being alone.
Loneliness is not much written about (my spell-check wanted me to say that loveliness is not much written about – how wrong that
is) but humankind is a social species and maybe it’s something we
should think about more than we do. I cannot think of many plays or
documentaries or novels about lonely people. Aah, look at them all, Paul
McCartney enjoined us in Eleanor Rigby… where do they all come from?
The strange thing is, if you see me in the street and engage in
conversation I will probably freeze into polite fear and smile inanely
until I can get away to be on my lonely ownsome.
Make of that what you will.
Sx
- See more at: http://www.stephenfry.com/2013/06/24/only-the-lonely/#sthash.c1PE5Abw.dpuf
By Stephen Fry
June 24th, 2013
There isn’t any point in denying that the outburst of sympathy and
support that followed my confession to an attempt at self-slaughter
last year (Richard Herring podcast) has touched me very deeply.
Some people, as some people always will, cannot understand that
depression (or in my case cyclothymia, a form of bipolar disorder) is an
illness and they are themselves perhaps the sufferers of a malady that
one might call either an obsession with money, or a woeful lack of
imagination.
“How can someone so well-off, well-known and successful have depression?” they ask. Alastair Campbell in a marvelous article,
suggested changing the word “depression” to “cancer” or “diabetes” in
order to reveal how, in its own way, sick a question, it is.
Ill-natured, ill-informed, ill-willed or just plain ill, it’s hard to
say.
But, most people, a surging, warm, caring majority, have been kind.
Almost too kind. There’s something a little flustering and embarrassing
when a taxi-driver shakes you by the hand, looks deep into your eyes and
says “You look after yourself, mate, yes? Promise me?” And there’s
something perhaps not too helpful to one’s mental health when it is the
only subject people want to talk to you about, however kindly or for
whatever reasons.
But I have nothing to complain about. I won’t go into the terrible
details of the bottle of vodka, the mixture of pills and the closeness
to permanent oblivion I came. You can imagine them and I don’t want to
upset the poor TV producer and hotel staff who had to break down my door
and find me in the unconscious state I was in, four broken ribs thanks
to some sort of convulsive fit that must have overtaken me while I lay
almost comatose, vomit dribbling from my mouth. You can picture the
scene.
The episode, plus the relationship I now have with a magnificent
psychiatrist, has made made my mental health better, I think, than it’s
ever been. I used to think it utterly normal that I suffered from
“suicidal ideation” on an almost daily basis. In other words, for as
long as I can remember, the thought of ending my life came to me
frequently and obsessively. But then it’s the thought behind the most
famous speech in all history. To be, or not to be.
To be, or not to be: that is the question:
Whether ’tis nobler in the mind to suffer
The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune,
Or to take arms against a sea of troubles,
And by opposing end them? To die: to sleep;
No more; and by a sleep to say we end
The heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks
That flesh is heir to, ’tis a consummation
Devoutly to be wish’d. To die, to sleep;
To sleep: perchance to dream: ay, there’s the rub;
For in that sleep of death what dreams may come
When we have shuffled off this mortal coil,
Must give us pause: there’s the respect
That makes calamity of so long life;
For who would bear the whips and scorns of time,
The oppressor’s wrong, the proud man’s contumely,
The pangs of despised love, the law’s delay,
The insolence of office and the spurns
That patient merit of the unworthy takes,
When he himself might his quietus make
With a bare bodkin? who would fardels bear,
To grunt and sweat under a weary life,
But that the dread of something after death,
The undiscover’d country from whose bourn
No traveller returns, puzzles the will
And makes us rather bear those ills we have
Than fly to others that we know not of?
Thus conscience does make cowards of us all;
And thus the native hue of resolution
Is sicklied o’er with the pale cast of thought,
And enterprises of great pith and moment
With this regard their currents turn awry,
And lose the name of action…
Take time to read it slowly to yourself or out loud. I don’t have
Hamlet’s wit (or Shakespeare’s of course) but every logical or doubtful
step from line to line expresses better how hard I thought about the
advantages and cursed (as I thought) disadvantages against suicide. The
speech, for the most part, stayed my hand. As it did Hamlet’s.
But medicine, much as some don’t like to hear it, can help. I am on a
regime of four a day. One is an SNRI, the other a mood-stabilizer. I
haven’t considered suicide in anything other than a puzzled intellectual
way since this pharmaceutical regime “kicked in”.
But I can still be sad. Perhaps you might go to my tumblr
page and see what Bertrand Russell wrote about his abiding passions
(it’s the last section of the page). I can be sad for the same reason he
was, though I do so much less about it than that great man did. But I
can be sad for personal reasons because I am often forlorn, unhappy and
lonely. These are qualities all humans suffer from and do not qualify
(except in their worst extremes) as mental illnesses.
Lonely? I get invitation cards through the post almost every
day. I shall be in the Royal Box at Wimbledon and I have serious and
generous offers from friends asking me to join them in the South of
France, Italy, Sicily, South Africa, British Columbia and America this
summer. I have two months to start a book before I go off to Broadway
for a run of Twelfth Night there.
I can read back that last sentence and see that, bipolar or not, if I’m under treatment and not actually depressed, what the fuck right do I have to be lonely, unhappy or forlorn? I don’t have the right. But there again I don’t have the right not to have those feelings. Feelings are not something to which one does or does not have rights.
In the end loneliness is the most terrible and contradictory of my
problems. I hate having only myself to come home to. If I have a book to
write, it’s fine. I’m up so early in the morning that even I pop out
for an early supper I am happy to go straight to bed, eager to be up and
writing at dawn the next day. But otherwise…
It’s not that I want a sexual partner, a long-term partner, someone
to share a bed and a snuggle on the sofa with – although perhaps I do
and in the past I have had and it has been joyful. But the fact is I
value my privacy too. It’s a lose-lose matter. I don’t want to be alone,
but I want to be left alone. Perhaps this is just a form of narcissism,
vanity, overdemanding entitlement – give it whatever derogatory term
you think it deserves. I don’t know the answer.
I suppose I just don’t like my own company very much. Which is odd,
given how many times people very kindly tell me that they’d put me on
their ideal dinner party guestlist. I do think I can usually be relied
upon to be good company when I’m out and about and sitting round a table
chatting, being silly, sharing jokes and stories and bringing shy
people out of their shells.
But then I get home and I’m all alone again.
I don’t write this for sympathy. I don’t write it as part as my on
going and undying commitment to the cause of mental health charities
like Mind. I don’t quite know why I write it. I think I write it because it fascinates me.
And perhaps I am writing this for any of you out there who are lonely
too. There’s not much we can do about it. I am luckier than many of you
because I am lonely in a crowd of people who are mostly very nice to me
and appear to be pleased to meet me. But I want you to know that you
are not alone in your being alone.
Loneliness is not much written about (my spell-check wanted me to say that loveliness is not much written about – how wrong that
is) but humankind is a social species and maybe it’s something we
should think about more than we do. I cannot think of many plays or
documentaries or novels about lonely people. Aah, look at them all, Paul
McCartney enjoined us in Eleanor Rigby… where do they all come from?
The strange thing is, if you see me in the street and engage in
conversation I will probably freeze into polite fear and smile inanely
until I can get away to be on my lonely ownsome.
Make of that what you will.
Sx
- See more at: http://www.stephenfry.com/2013/06/24/only-the-lonely/#sthash.c1PE5Abw.dpuf